Terulia Forums > FFO Consortium > Question & Answer

The icon checkers, THEY SUCK
Lards Pingas	3:33 PM on October 17, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Advanced Members Posts: 331 Total: 701	This guy, I didnt snap a shot while he was onscreen, I don't know or care who he is, but HIS ICON CONTAINS INVIS STATES. Didn't melody's get removed for that bullshit? His wounded state, A VERY COMMON ONE, has him turning completely invisible, fading in and out of view frequently. It's unfair and stupid and I'm psure it's SPOSED TO BE ILLEGAL. How are so many people sneaking these things past? Who's been asleep at the wheel here. I HAVE FURY!!! _________________________________________ Keepin on peepin!

Oondivinezin	4:00 PM on October 17, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Advanced Members Posts: 76 Total: 201	Here's how I treat icons. The first times someone complains, the icon's going to be removed (And it has). If you can clear up all of the invisibility issues I'll put it back in. _________________________________________

Locke	10:57 PM on October 17, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Advanced Members Posts: 521 Total: 1962	Oondiv wrote: Here's how I treat icons. The first times someone complains, the icon's going to be removed (And it has). If you can clear up all of the invisibility issues I'll put it back in. If this is how the issue was handled I don't see any problem with my icon checkers. _________________________________________ The lions sing and the hills take flight. The moon by day, and the sun by night. Blind woman, deaf man, jackdaw fool. Let the Lord of Chaos rule.

watabou	11:22 PM on October 17, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Advanced Members Posts: 9 Total: 15	wow another fucen nabutso clone _________________________________________

Nabutso Zaih	4:04 PM on October 20, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: >:( Posts: 145 Total: 489	wow guess what it doesnt have any invis states it has some semi transparent ones. some that go to like alpha 125. so fucking what. dana's was down to like 75 but i changed it to go up to like 125 like wata's and it was OK'd. and then i removed them myself becuase i wanted to, not becuase anyone told me to. and wow gj being pissed at wata not knowing it was him. bet ya wouldntve cared if ya knew u big fag _________________________________________

deanbad	4:09 PM on October 20, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Members Posts: 604 Total: 2374	ITT: LP bitching about stuff he knows nothing about. Also available at a webforum near you, There's only three items in the shop! _________________________________________ "Take this shipment of supplies to Gillian, and try not to murder anyone's parents along the way, alright?"

Aries	4:30 PM on October 20, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Members Posts: 275 Total: 708	Unless it's near-unseeable or completely invisible, I don't see the problem with it. I can see him being extremely hard to see in a nighttime area however, since his icon is mostly black. Maybe transparent states should be mentioned specifically in the rules. _________________________________________ Censorshit is a bitch.

Cea	4:31 PM on October 20, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Genius Posts: 837 Total: 1990	Aries wrote: Unless it's near-unseeable or completely invisible, I don't see the problem with it. I can see him being extremely hard to see in a nighttime area however, since his icon is mostly black. Maybe transparent states should be mentioned specifically in the rules. You aren't an icon checker. _________________________________________ A good player knows how to play his class. An elitist knows how to play everyone else's class.

Aries	4:37 PM on October 20, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Members Posts: 275 Total: 708	Cea wrote: Aries wrote: Unless it's near-unseeable or completely invisible, I don't see the problem with it. I can see him being extremely hard to see in a nighttime area however, since his icon is mostly black. Maybe transparent states should be mentioned specifically in the rules. You aren't an icon checker. I'm talking from a normal guy reading the guidelines' perspective. <_< _________________________________________ Censorshit is a bitch.

Hazedreamfreysaraboy	4:46 PM on October 20, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Mayor Posts: 520 Total: 1095	Whether it's near invisible, invisible, whatever, it's all debatable.. but in the time it would take to debate it, would probably be simpler to just make it more visible I guess. _________________________________________ Huckey168 (ffo): Your a idiot beyong all imagining.

Garral	1:28 PM on October 27, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Advanced Members Posts: 71 Total: 193	It doesn't matter in the end. Invis states are allowed TO A REASONABLE DEGREE because all icons have a transparent hitbox anyway that allows them to be targeted despite visibility status. _________________________________________ What a silly thing.

Oondivinezin	2:47 PM on October 27, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Advanced Members Posts: 76 Total: 201	Still the fact that you have to find them... _________________________________________

DeshTheWraith	2:54 PM on October 27, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Advanced Members Posts: 335 Total: 963	Can't you target concealed and vanished people? _________________________________________ Haze wrote: We can't all be Deshawns, Deshawn. We actually have to focus on PvP, we can't record it, take screenshots, smoke a blunt and bang our girlfriends all while killing people >=(

Oondivinezin	1:14 PM on October 27, 2009	(+0/-0)
Group: Advanced Members Posts: 76 Total: 201	There's something in the code that makes you not able to cast/attack a concealed target. _________________________________________

Forum Home > FFO Consortium > Question & Answer > The icon checkers

1 forum user ( 0 registered, 1 guest, 0 bots ) currently viewing this topic.

This page was generated in 0.3 seconds.
Terulia forums are hosted for free at www.terulia.com [ Terms of Service: Updated 4/28/2011 ].