Of course you would wanna drop it, nothing happened to you guys. You got no punishment out of it. Think about it, getting killed rapidly, and it was more then once. You all had turns on killing me, atleast twice per person. (No lie).


You stopped, I came outta town? well think about it, Darlute was chaseing me around. He cast fast, DArk 2 me, outta town, cus guards couldn't do anything, and with my Death sickness my hp was about 395. with 1 dark, my hp was red, i cast cure only does 220-230. Then i ran, saw you guys, tried to run back into town, you caught me, dead again.

_________________________________________

We did one drive by in town and after that I told everyone I'm not doing it any more and they shouldn't either. And they stopped. Then we waited outside. Then Black came outside.

I just wanna point out that when I got banned (after my party mates had killed the person just 2 times before) he had walked outside TO me. Didn't seem to matter that he came out of the domain limits (to speak to me, yeah but the point is that he came out after just the way your describing what Black did).

I'm just seeing a very BLATANT double-standard here.

-Well-liked, sensible, friendly player killed twice, comes outside killed once more. Offending party is banned.

-Generally disliked, aggressive player comes back to game, gets repeatedly killed in a domain he doesn't even HAVE the option to leave. Offending party gets victim banned.

Is that an accurate summary?

_________________________________________

the summary is:

- its basically impossible to tell who kept attacking who first unless you have a VIDEO or some shit from EVERY PERSON WHO IS INVOLVED's point of view.

_________________________________________

Garral's right about circle arguments here. If I had any sense I'd lock this topic but I have this thing about letting people speak their mind even if it's against me.

I've said the same thing several times now. And then the same thing was said back.

Black kept fighting. "but no he didn't" etc etc

No one will take Black's word here mainly because he's an idiot who has spammed killed before and is always trying to get people in trouble. With that being said I don't see what these screen shots are saying.

Since so far it's been a battle of one guy's word over another and that obviously isn't going to work I guess I'll have to submit and just wait for more evidence to come of the most heinous crime I committed. Even the though VERY day before I was defending Black for jerks killing him in Argo. Then hunting him when he left Argo. I defended him then because they were making it their goal to hunt him and kill him. That's spam killing. That's grieving. When he LEAVES to do other stuff and still gets killed. In my case he never left to do other things. Like he did before, WHEN I DEFENDED HIM.


Why... do I... bother...

I should just make Garral an admin so he can lock these topics and piss all you people off who I'm starting to think just argue for the drama / to get others in trouble.

I'm turning into GARRAL LOOK WHAT YOU PEOPLE ARE DOING.

edit: in fact, topic locked. I win, Black. Since that's how YOU'LL see it.

Maybe post some real evidence later, eh?

_________________________________________

Topic unlocked. discuss _________________________________________ Huckey168 (ffo): Your a idiot beyong all imagining.

reply to Haze:

fyloc...... lmao

_________________________________________

I agree, Cea and Fyloc should be banned.

_________________________________________

Bant I tell ya BANT!!! _________________________________________

Lanail wrote:

Bant I tell ya BANT!!!

Don't worry. "Cea", "darlute", "fyloc" and "the other people" have all been bant.

_________________________________________

Wait did something happen relevant to this issue, or are you unlocking just because?

_________________________________________

Nothing of relevance has happened.

_________________________________________

The Real Cea wrote:

If I had any sense I'd lock this topic but I have this thing about letting people speak their mind even if it's against me.

Can't say the same for the other mods in your forum which is why I rarely post here (when I'm not blacklisted).

Consortium mods wrote:

sup, not agreeing with your posts/threads, deleting said posts/threads and blacklisting you.

True story. It's a mini-series.

_________________________________________

Blacklist on, blacklist off. Zap!

_________________________________________

say what now

_________________________________________

Deancro Malfoy wrote:

The Real Cea wrote:

If I had any sense I'd lock this topic but I have this thing about letting people speak their mind even if it's against me.

Can't say the same for the other mods in your forum which is why I rarely post here (when I'm not blacklisted).

Consortium mods wrote:

sup, not agreeing with your posts/threads, deleting said posts/threads and blacklisting you.

True story. It's a mini-series.

Blacklisted for having an opinion other than my own.

_________________________________________